3 ms·
Does it have to? I sort of assumed it would be the antitrust regulator. Amazon is too big and smart to engage in outright tax or securities fraud.
by Analemma_ 9y ago
Does it have to? I sort of assumed it would be the antitrust regulator. Amazon is too big and smart to engage in outright tax or securities fraud.
- spyspy 9y agoYes? It could've been their environmental regulator for all we know.
- mfoy_ 9y agoOr labour, if they had illegal working conditions, or anything at all, really...
- hangonhn 9y agoThis is something I've been told when I worked for a hedge fund that had an office in Tokyo: Japanese regulators can raid you, download all your information, and that information can somehow end up in the hands of your rivals. It sounds like regulator raids can be used for corporate espionage and it can happen quite arbitrarily. I don't know if it is true but the fund certainly believed in it enough to setup a whole separate network in Tokyo that was not connected back to the network in the US. Everything done with the US was done via remote console.
- astrodust 9y agoNobody is too big to engage in tax or securities fraud.