3 ms·
Ok I admit the mistaken word in the article. Still the argument is valid, don't you agree? :)
by drodil 9y ago
Ok I admit the mistaken word in the article. Still the argument is valid, don't you agree? :)
- raesene9 9y agoif you'd argued that the Docx format is unecessarily verbose, well that's a possibility (Although the problem is that MS are dealing with 30 years of legacy here, it's not a simple task. One of Word's better achievements is that I can generally open 20+ year old documents and they'll render just like they did back when they were created) but to say that .docx is a binary file format, nope, it's a zipped text file format. If you parse docx you unzip and use an XML parser, you don't use a binary parser. .doc was a binary format, but that's not been a default file format for Word in the last 15 years.