I was surprised by the number of false positives reported here, went ahead and tested on several Twitter accounts of my friends, both professional and personal.

I was surprised by the number of false positives reported here, went ahead and tested on several Twitter accounts of my friends, both professional and personal. 9 out of 25 tested were classified as 'bot' with probability > 0.6. Only 11 were classified as 'humans' with probability > 0.7. And that's on 25 accounts of people I know personally. Given the preposterous error rate, I deem there is no actual classification logic in R, and instead it uses the (very fallible) humans to do the actual classification via a Mechanical Turk-style API. Wait, do I need to add "/s" to this post, or is it obvious enough?