5 ms·

Technical report is here: http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SRI_Technical_Report.pdf http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/S

• Erlangolem 9y ago
  I can’t find any mention of this report from SRI, only on Brillouin’s site, and other cold fusion pages. Given the insanely high bar of reasonable skepticism any claim of cold fusion has to meet, this is suspicious. I mean, it’s no more suspicious than any claim of “over-unity” from people raising millions to follow in the footsteps of Pons and Fleischman. Meanwhile I’m shocked that an essentially unsupported pseudo report on cold fusion of all things is the top post on the front page here! What gives?
  • amluto 9y ago
    The report claims to be written by "Francis Tanzella", who seems to actually exist and probably even works at SRI. However, the report claims that he's the PI and Manager of "Low Energy Reactions Research Program", and I see no evidence that such a program exists.
• seltzered_ 9y ago
  And the progress report from roughly a year ago is here: http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SRI_ProgressReport.pdf http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SRI_Pr... "During 2017, the calorimeter design was modified to match the analytical methodology suggested by an independent commercial third-party reviewer, who is also overseeing their suggested stimulation and analyses (see dynamic stimulation below)." Looking at both years side-by-side is interesting, there's slight differences in the figures and text where some things are added and some details removed.