2 ms·
But why use webasm for that when llvm already does it better?
by andromeduck 9y ago
But why use webasm for that when llvm already does it better?
- harpocrates 9y agoI'm not sure I understand: WebAssembly is the output of a (hopefully) optimizing compiler. LLVM is such a compiler backend. If you use WebAssembly today, you are probably going through LLVM. Perhaps you meant: why not use LLVM IR instead of WebAssembly? If so, allow me to refer you to this comment[1] (from a bit further down in this thread). [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16586239 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16586239