3 ms·
For some weird reason, after Google Reader shut down, I tried several RSS readers, including OldReader, the AOL one (I think) and Digg Reader. As I used to vis
by rsoto 9y ago
For some weird reason, after Google Reader shut down, I tried several RSS readers, including OldReader, the AOL one (I think) and Digg Reader.
As I used to visit Digg quite often (it's not the crowdsourcing site anymore, but an editorial-based one) because of its content, I stuck with it.
It started ok—what you would expect from a feed reader. It was clean, it updated quite often, it was good.
But three or so years ago, it started to look stale. No new features, and worse: the count read was wrong, and often it would mark your items as read. It was clunky and unreliable, late last year I moved to feedly and haven't look back.
The lesson here is that maybe there's no model for a free hosted RSS reader. Google found out, and then some others.
And that's not good for an open web.
- CalRobert 9y agoIt's not ideal, but maybe it's OK inasmuch as I use a local RSS reader (feedbro) perfectly happily. It works, it's not beholden to another company, and its feature set will remain the same as long as I choose not to upgrade it.