I guess that's true. Then it's even more bold and wacky to declare that we need new physics to describe a thing that is so controversial in its function or effe

I guess that's true. Then it's even more bold and wacky to declare that we need new physics to describe a thing that is so controversial in its function or effects. I (possibly mis-)translated into intelligent behaviour in my memory, since that's something most people agree does real work and needs explaining.