3 ms·
Good. While they had a good idea, it's run by unethical and terrible people who really have no regard for the safety of the public. It seems like every time the
by RoyTyrell 9y ago
Good. While they had a good idea, it's run by unethical and terrible people who really have no regard for the safety of the public. It seems like every time they were forced to show any level of proof they lied until they were caught. If a pharmaceutical company operated like they do, I doubt anyone would be praising them for any reason.
- EpicEng 9y agoWhat was the good idea exactly? As far as I'm aware the details of their (non-existent) tech have never been shared, not even with investors. Anyone can think up some pie in the sky idea.
- RoyTyrell 9y ago> What was the good idea exactly? Using tiny amounts of blood to do a whole entire blood workup. > their (non-existent) tech Some of it existed. It just required them lying about using other companies' products with a standard volume of blood. The rest of course was entirely made up. > Anyone can think up some pie in the sky idea. I agree. I just said the idea was good but unfortunately for her, even being a mega-uber-disrupter-genius like Elizabeth Homes, our level of technology isn't there yet and maybe never will be.