3 ms·
I don't think Penrose's position is that you need new physics for intelligent behavior, but rather that new physics is needed to explain consciousness. There's
by antognini 9y ago
I don't think Penrose's position is that you need new physics for intelligent behavior, but rather that new physics is needed to explain consciousness. There's a big metaphysical difference between the two.
- robotresearcher 9y agoI guess that's true. Then it's even more bold and wacky to declare that we need new physics to describe a thing that is so controversial in its function or effects. I (possibly mis-)translated into intelligent behaviour in my memory, since that's something most people agree does real work and needs explaining.