4 ms·
They may not have purposefully designed it originally, but they purposefully keep it hard to use now. Internally, they have Quickbooks training courses that ne
by curun1r 9y ago
They may not have purposefully designed it originally, but they purposefully keep it hard to use now.
Internally, they have Quickbooks training courses that new employees and employees who work on other products can take. When I took the course, I asked why deleting a transaction was a completely different UI interaction from deleting a contact in QBO. Both pages were, at their core, list widgets so both should share UI, right? But, I was told, they'd done UX tests with experienced users who had strong reactions to making UI interactions like that consistent.
The problem isn't lack of good UX designers. When I was there, they hired Frog design to completely rethink many of the UI interactions. This was in addition to many talented UI/UX people that work on the product full time. It's a product that brings in billions of dollars a year...the resources are there to fix it. But the problem is an existing product and a user base that's resistant to change and one that views their proficiency in the product as an achievement that they'd like competing bookkeepers to also have to attain.
- detaro 9y ago> But, I was told, they'd done UX tests with experienced users who had strong reactions to making UI interactions like that consistent. Had they strong reactions to those being consistent (and thus easier to learn), or did they have strong reactions to those being different from what they were used to?
- cmurf 9y agoThis is strongly embedded in the accounting culture (CPA, in particular tax preparation business): I want every man, woman and child to understand how close we are to chaos. I want everyone to remember why they need us!
- curun1r 9y agoUpvoted both for being spot on and for the excellent VfV reference!