4 ms·

While that does seem unfair, how airtight would that case have to be? As outlined in another comment here, the CFO and CMO of Equifax appear to have dumped jus

by alehul 9y ago

While that does seem unfair, how airtight would that case have to be? As outlined in another comment here, the CFO and CMO of Equifax appear to have dumped just as much if not more than this employee being indicted, however they're yet to be prosecuted, possibly due to less evidence. Would James Clapper be able to either claim a different definition of spying (i.e. "We collected this information but only accessed it when relevant"), or to claim it was "necessary for national security" to lie?

pixl97 9y ago
>While that does seem unfair, how airtight would that case have to be? And therein lies the issue. If you are rich the state has to spend huge amounts of money to prove the case 'beyond a reasonable doubt', unfortunately for the poor it seems 'the preponderance of evidence' seems to be more than enough to get a criminal conviction.