3 ms·

Agreed. I'm amazed the comment got such a negative reaction. I can't think of anyone I know who would be happy about being called a chick, however casually.

purple-again 9y ago
https://hackerchick.com/ https://hackerchick.com/ http://chickswhocode.com/ http://chickswhocode.com/ http://chickscancode.com/ http://chickscancode.com/ I spent 5 seconds googling.
- sli 9y ago
  Nostalgia Chick is another one, though I don't think she does that actual show anymore.
- bunderbunder 9y ago
  There can be some subtlety there, though. Where I come from (central US), "chick" is similar to "dork" in that it can, but doesn't necessarily, have derogatory connotations. It depends a lot on context. It's perfectly acceptable (though slightly cheeky) to call oneself a dork in public, but you typically wouldn't call someone else a dork unless you were already on very familiar terms with that person. And you would only do it in familiar circumstances. Doing it with someone you don't know very well, or doing it in public, would be considered offensive. Doubly so if you don't know them and it's in public. Chick operates the same way, only it's got even more cultural baggage because it features in a lot of memes that are associated with sexism (e.g., the phrase "cruising for chicks"). So I wouldn't even dream of presuming that it's OK for me to call someone else a chick in public, even if I knew them to be a founding member of Chicks who Code. I realize that the original poster was probably just trying to be cute. But, as John Scalzi famously observed, "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole'."
- gaius 9y ago
  There used to be unixchix.com too, but I think it’s defunct
- tropdrop 9y ago
  You have to remember that a minority group will often attempt to reclaim a derogatory term as their own to take the bite out of it. A great example is the term "Yankee" back during the American revolution, but I am sure you can think of a more recent term this has happened to.
astura 9y ago
There's some who self identify with it, Skepchick and The Dixie Chicks come to mind, but it can be considered somewhat derogatory, dismissive, or at least belittling in some contexts to some people. I think context and age matters a lot here (as well as personal preference) - young women and (especially) girls may use the term amongst themselves but middle age women almost certainly wouldn't, if you called your boss "chick," it would be seen as inappropriate, belittling and disrespectful. It's in the same category (but not "severity") as other diminutives like sweetie, honey, babe, girl, girly, and doll. It may vary by region too, I know at least certain diminutives don't have the same connotations in the American South as they do elsewhere. In general, you should probably avoid calling an adult woman you are personally unfamiliar with "chick" in many contexts, not necessarily because "PC police," but because it's just bad for communication - its not necessary and it can be a distraction from the actual message you're conveying. Personally, as a woman approaching 40, I can't think of any context I'd care to be called "chick" in. Not necessarily offended but it would be just icky. EDIT: Some discussion: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19098/how-derogatory-is-chicks-when-used-to-refer-to-women https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19098/how-deroga... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/30/bird-infantilising-hold-women-back https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/30/bird-i...
- WorldMaker 9y ago
  Yeah, I think the issue is a casual/familiarity vs. professional/formal situation distinction more than a politically correct one. Dude/chick make sense in casual situations where one has some familiarity relationship with the other person. They aren't often terms one would use in a formal or professional relationship. I suppose the interesting question to ask is does HN think of itself as more of a professional/formal discussion community than one that leans towards casual/familiar? (I'd assume that the answer is that it probably varies with comment writer and both sides of the argument are represented here and have fair points.)
  - iamdave 9y ago
    I suppose the interesting question to ask is does HN think of itself as more of a professional/formal discussion community than one that leans towards casual/familiar? I don't speak for everyone, I'm merely speaking in observation: the former is the status quo, the latter I have seen completely derail threads (we're in one one of those box cars right now) and in my own opinion, which is mine and no one else's, not out of maliciousness (or at least, rarely so), but because of the clash when subscribers of the first group run into subscribers of the second group... and neither one wants to give the other an inch.
SlowRobotAhead 9y ago
I guess I wish I had so few problems and concerns of my own that I had time to be offended for people i don’t know. Especially on something so innocent and common. Seems like a luxury.
- chx 9y ago
  I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. I was hesitating before writing that comment but the problem is, if nothing else but #metoo should've taught you: we -- and by "we" I mean us privileged in color and gender -- need to talk up because those who are offended do not always dare to do so.
  - iamdave 9y ago
    I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. I'm a black male, I happen to be somewhat in agreement with the commenter you're replying to here-because I happen to have felt that very sensation he describes in conversations very much like this one; that of people being offended on my behalf. Why are you weaponizing race like this?
  - SlowRobotAhead 9y ago
    > I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. Ah, the only people it's ENCOURAGED to be prejudiced against while preaching tolerance. How novel! You have no idea what I identify as, your comments just now in assuming my identify and race are far more offensive than calling out a completely positive mention of some chick, right? I'm offended now you need to change your mind. Those are the rules as I understand them. Oh but wait, you're literally saying you are of the "privileged class" so you can do as you please... ? I like it, the full hypocritical double-down with a side of twitter "activism" where people shut their mouth not because of fear but because it directly benefited their careers and waiting to call it out did so as well. Yes, I agree that you need to be concerned with other people's issues, like non-gun owners should understand an attack of civil rights at the plea of emotions is not in their best interest either. However... if your bar is set to "someone said the word chick!" well, congrats on solving all serious problems already.

purple-again 9y ago

https://hackerchick.com/ https://hackerchick.com/ http://chickswhocode.com/ http://chickswhocode.com/ http://chickscancode.com/ http://chickscancode.com/ I spent 5 seconds googling.

sli 9y ago
Nostalgia Chick is another one, though I don't think she does that actual show anymore.
bunderbunder 9y ago
There can be some subtlety there, though. Where I come from (central US), "chick" is similar to "dork" in that it can, but doesn't necessarily, have derogatory connotations. It depends a lot on context. It's perfectly acceptable (though slightly cheeky) to call oneself a dork in public, but you typically wouldn't call someone else a dork unless you were already on very familiar terms with that person. And you would only do it in familiar circumstances. Doing it with someone you don't know very well, or doing it in public, would be considered offensive. Doubly so if you don't know them and it's in public. Chick operates the same way, only it's got even more cultural baggage because it features in a lot of memes that are associated with sexism (e.g., the phrase "cruising for chicks"). So I wouldn't even dream of presuming that it's OK for me to call someone else a chick in public, even if I knew them to be a founding member of Chicks who Code. I realize that the original poster was probably just trying to be cute. But, as John Scalzi famously observed, "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole'."
gaius 9y ago
There used to be unixchix.com too, but I think it’s defunct
tropdrop 9y ago
You have to remember that a minority group will often attempt to reclaim a derogatory term as their own to take the bite out of it. A great example is the term "Yankee" back during the American revolution, but I am sure you can think of a more recent term this has happened to.

astura 9y ago

There's some who self identify with it, Skepchick and The Dixie Chicks come to mind, but it can be considered somewhat derogatory, dismissive, or at least belittling in some contexts to some people. I think context and age matters a lot here (as well as personal preference) - young women and (especially) girls may use the term amongst themselves but middle age women almost certainly wouldn't, if you called your boss "chick," it would be seen as inappropriate, belittling and disrespectful. It's in the same category (but not "severity") as other diminutives like sweetie, honey, babe, girl, girly, and doll. It may vary by region too, I know at least certain diminutives don't have the same connotations in the American South as they do elsewhere. In general, you should probably avoid calling an adult woman you are personally unfamiliar with "chick" in many contexts, not necessarily because "PC police," but because it's just bad for communication - its not necessary and it can be a distraction from the actual message you're conveying. Personally, as a woman approaching 40, I can't think of any context I'd care to be called "chick" in. Not necessarily offended but it would be just icky. EDIT: Some discussion: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19098/how-derogatory-is-chicks-when-used-to-refer-to-women https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19098/how-deroga... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/30/bird-infantilising-hold-women-back https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/30/bird-i...

WorldMaker 9y ago
Yeah, I think the issue is a casual/familiarity vs. professional/formal situation distinction more than a politically correct one. Dude/chick make sense in casual situations where one has some familiarity relationship with the other person. They aren't often terms one would use in a formal or professional relationship. I suppose the interesting question to ask is does HN think of itself as more of a professional/formal discussion community than one that leans towards casual/familiar? (I'd assume that the answer is that it probably varies with comment writer and both sides of the argument are represented here and have fair points.)
- iamdave 9y ago
  I suppose the interesting question to ask is does HN think of itself as more of a professional/formal discussion community than one that leans towards casual/familiar? I don't speak for everyone, I'm merely speaking in observation: the former is the status quo, the latter I have seen completely derail threads (we're in one one of those box cars right now) and in my own opinion, which is mine and no one else's, not out of maliciousness (or at least, rarely so), but because of the clash when subscribers of the first group run into subscribers of the second group... and neither one wants to give the other an inch.

SlowRobotAhead 9y ago

I guess I wish I had so few problems and concerns of my own that I had time to be offended for people i don’t know. Especially on something so innocent and common. Seems like a luxury.

chx 9y ago
I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. I was hesitating before writing that comment but the problem is, if nothing else but #metoo should've taught you: we -- and by "we" I mean us privileged in color and gender -- need to talk up because those who are offended do not always dare to do so.
- iamdave 9y ago
  I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. I'm a black male, I happen to be somewhat in agreement with the commenter you're replying to here-because I happen to have felt that very sensation he describes in conversations very much like this one; that of people being offended on my behalf. Why are you weaponizing race like this?
- SlowRobotAhead 9y ago
  > I will presume you are a white male just because of the place we are in and your tone. Ah, the only people it's ENCOURAGED to be prejudiced against while preaching tolerance. How novel! You have no idea what I identify as, your comments just now in assuming my identify and race are far more offensive than calling out a completely positive mention of some chick, right? I'm offended now you need to change your mind. Those are the rules as I understand them. Oh but wait, you're literally saying you are of the "privileged class" so you can do as you please... ? I like it, the full hypocritical double-down with a side of twitter "activism" where people shut their mouth not because of fear but because it directly benefited their careers and waiting to call it out did so as well. Yes, I agree that you need to be concerned with other people's issues, like non-gun owners should understand an attack of civil rights at the plea of emotions is not in their best interest either. However... if your bar is set to "someone said the word chick!" well, congrats on solving all serious problems already.