6 ms·

> is elitist I know I'm supposed to think that that is bad, but I can't come up with why it would be.

• threatofrain 9y ago
  It really depends on some pretty subjective values held on faith, that position, power, and profit ought to be shared.
  • TeMPOraL 9y ago
    Or, as seems more accurate in this example, subjective belief that anyone should get arbitrary amount of praise for just showing up, instead of having to earn it through the process of honing and applying their skills.
    • threatofrain 9y ago
      Presumably, though, in the hypothetical presented in the thread, the "top" 10% wouldn't be people who just showed up? And the "plumbers" are the ones who cannot build on their own? The question is why elitism is wrong. Your statements rest on whether that perception of elite status is wrong. Well, if that is ever resolved, is elitism wrong or not? Ought power, profit, and position be shared?
    • chrstphrhrt 9y ago
      In my experience the innovators must toil in obscurity because they see a vision that others cannot yet see, until the thing is realized. Then the prototypes get handed off to the main engineers to run with, and support is provided. By the time the thing sees production usage, the original inventor has long since moved onto solving other problems on the horizon. Praise is attributed to the last and loudest to have touched a project. Innovators are deeply satisfied by that and don't need the praise because it actually gets in the way.