What's important aren't really the bugs, bugs can be fixed. What's important is who is allowed to run, inspect, share, and modify the code. If only the copyrigh

What's important aren't really the bugs, bugs can be fixed. What's important is who is allowed to run, inspect, share, and modify the code. If only the copyright holder is allowed to do this, that's proprietary software and that's malicious. If a user's software freedom is respected so users can choose to fix it themselves, wait for another release, hire someone else to fix the code, or live with the bugs that's treating the user properly. Everyone makes mistakes; it's more about how those mistakes are handled and if a user's control over their computer is respected.