3 ms·

Your position on this is a little disturbing, and ignores every child/young adult who either grew up poor and had to work, or worked part time because their par

Your position on this is a little disturbing, and ignores every child/young adult who either grew up poor and had to work, or worked part time because their parents didnt buy them a car or every other thing they wanted as a teen. Or, they just actually wanted a job. I mean, in the US you can go anywhere and there's 15 and 16 year olds working as clerks, restaurant employees, etc. I got my first legally taxed job in Indiana as a 'root beer boy' at a diner when I was 14! Edit: https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/youth-employment/ https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/youth-employment/ From link, "As of October 2015, 49 percent of all youth ages 16-24 were employed in any work, either full- or part-time. Youth enrolled in high school had an employment rate of 18 percent, while the rate for those in college, either full- or part-time, was 45 percent."

mulmen 9y ago
My position on this is not disturbing at all. My position on this is that education improves the future productivity of our youth. We trade economic productivity today for increases in future production. You have cited a problem. The fact that we make children work to support their families holds them back from being the ones who kaizendad refers to. Children who have the benefit of education early on are more likely to be productive later in life. I also had my first paying job at a young age. My economic benefit today is much larger in comparison and continues to increase year over year. My maximum economic contribution has yet to occur even though my youthful employment was decades in the past.