> 1-day notice? Such aggressive wording without even the chance for AMD to address the concerns? Are the reporting parties under any obligation to give AMD not

> 1-day notice? Such aggressive wording without even the chance for AMD to address the concerns? Are the reporting parties under any obligation to give AMD notice? Behaving according to AMD's wishes is not an obligation. Businesses will be the first to tell you that agreements and laws form obligations, not what someone perceives as a nice thing to do. If not, then you're reacting to a distraction, a detail that doesn't matter: how the corporate-friendly tech press is trying to shift blame away from the party that either sold CPUs with bugs in them (mistakes happen, and this is unfortunate) or distributed nonfree (proprietary, user-subjugating) software which also happens to contain insecurities (a malicious and unjust way to distribute software).