6 ms·
> Also, setting up Kubernetes RBAC to allow Travis CI to do a kubectl set-image isn’t trivial either. Wouldn't setting up Keel on a Kubernetes cluster be the s
by ecthiender 9y ago
> Also, setting up Kubernetes RBAC to allow Travis CI to do a kubectl set-image isn’t trivial either.
Wouldn't setting up Keel on a Kubernetes cluster be the same effort (permissions, RBAC etc.)?
- tirumaraiselvan 9y agoOn that note, Gitkube supports RBAC as the Remote objects are namespaced. This means two things: 1) Remotes are isolated - have different authorizations for say dev and staging remotes 2) Deployments are isolated - A Remote can only deploy apps in its own namespace.
- praseodym 9y agoKeel has permissions to update all deployments in our cluster. Because it runs within the cluster instead of outside (like Travis CI), and the only interaction with Keel is through webhooks, there is no need for finegrained RBAC. The webhooks only tell Keel that a new image is available, they cannot modify other parts of the Kubernetes deployment directly.