2 ms·
Not strictly necessary, no. But the example I wrote was getting at was meant to point out that this bifurcation can make it harder to compose generic types. It'
by bunderbunder 9y ago
Not strictly necessary, no. But the example I wrote was getting at was meant to point out that this bifurcation can make it harder to compose generic types. It's not really an ideal design decision for modern C# so much as a hold-over from the language's early years, when idiomatic usage favored a much more imperative style of programming.