3 ms·
> For an example, if you have an array with no holes in it, for is better performant then forEach. Do you mean it's faster? (Don't use performant: use fast or
by theandrewbailey 9y ago
> For an example, if you have an array with no holes in it, for is better performant then forEach.
Do you mean it's faster? (Don't use performant: use fast or faster instead.)
- mercer 9y agoI might be wrong, but 'faster' strikes me as a more ambiguous word. In this context it would be clear, but I can see how consistently using performant would help in clarifying what this 'faster' you're talking about is.