> shutting down Facebook would not change anything. You’re just asserting this without any argument, even though it was addressed in the post you’re responding

> shutting down Facebook would not change anything. You’re just asserting this without any argument, even though it was addressed in the post you’re responding to. What would be used instead of Facebook? If that other platform is as convenient and effective as FB, why is it not used today? And since you are agreeing that censorship of hate could help: why do you believe the appropriate distribution of the responsibility for such censorship is more important than stopping a genocide?