>Unlike cars, there is a finite supply of real property, most of which is enjoyed by its owners for whatever purpose they choose. In what world do you live in

>Unlike cars, there is a finite supply of real property, most of which is enjoyed by its owners for whatever purpose they choose. In what world do you live in where the number of housing units in a city is bounded by some value? A cursory examination of any city's housing stock data would tell you otherwise. >To borrow your car analogy, there will never be a "Toyota" housing unit built in Atherton, CA or a few blocks from Rockeffler Center in NYC. This is like saying that when you go to the Mercedes dealership all you see is expensive cars, therefore there only exists expensive cars. Each incremental Mercedes that is produced does not raise the price of a Toyota. In fact, the derivative of that price curve is most likely negative. Why is housing any different? >The current issues have more to do with a glut of cash than a shortage of housing. I agree that low interest rates have exacerbated the situation, but the fact of the matter is that there is a net influx of people to large cities like San Francisco, and there is indeed a shortage of housing. Why you choose to ignore the data, I do not know.