3 ms·
> As a media business, they can be a lot more profitable with fewer high-quality users than hordes of low-quality toxic users. I see no evidence of that. > A
by Slansitartop 9y ago
> As a media business, they can be a lot more profitable with fewer high-quality users than hordes of low-quality toxic users.
I see no evidence of that.
> A fashion magazine only has 1 million subscribers, but can make $400 million/year in revenue, basically printing money.
A fashion magazine doesn't outsource its content production to its subscribers.
- mozumder 9y ago> I see no evidence of that. I would encourage you to look at the evidence. > A fashion magazine doesn't outsource its content production to its subscribers. And?
- Slansitartop 9y ago>>> As a media business, they can be a lot more profitable with fewer high-quality users than hordes of low-quality toxic users. >> I see no evidence of that. > I would encourage you to look at the evidence. I would encourage you to provide it.