4 ms·

Unless I'm missing something, this title is misleading. The article itself doesn't say anything about Jobs making that statement, only the fact that Cult of Mac

by alexyim 16y ago

Unless I'm missing something, this title is misleading. The article itself doesn't say anything about Jobs making that statement, only the fact that Cult of Mac speculates that FB's terms became onerous.

CodeMage 16y ago
The article links to the following article: http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100902/steve-jobs-on-why-facebook-is-not-part-of-apples-new-ping-music-social-network-onerous-terms/ http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100902/steve-jobs-on-why-facebo... Here's the relevant quote from that article: When I asked Jobs about that, he said Apple had indeed held talks with Facebook about a variety of unspecified partnerships related to Ping, but the discussions went nowhere. The reason, according to Jobs: Facebook wanted "onerous terms that we could not agree to."
- alexyim 16y ago
  Thanks