I don't think this paper was even about replication. A replication is when one person/group does something, they write down instructions for someone else to do

I don't think this paper was even about replication. A replication is when one person/group does something, they write down instructions for someone else to do the same thing, and then the results are compared. Is there a single mention of this happening in that paper? I expected a table of such results. Ie, replication is about doing some very specific thing, instead I see a bunch of vague stuff like "abnormal is normal"...