5 ms·
It's complicated and I'm not an expert, but I understand the main risk with TBMs is running into a type of rock it can't handle and suddenly having a multi-mill
by jpatokal 9y ago
It's complicated and I'm not an expert, but I understand the main risk with TBMs is running into a type of rock it can't handle and suddenly having a multi-million dollar paperweight wedged in a very awkward location. They're also not well suited to really hard rock, which requires frequent cutter replacements.
In this case, the tunnel is very long and deep, magnifying the unknown territory risk. Also, the bedrock in most of Scandinavia (and, I presume, Stockholm) is both very shallow and mostly granite, which is extremely hard and thus not a good fit for a TBM.
Source: My childhood in Helsinki was punctuated by the periodic sound of blasting rock as they cut out what was supposed to be the new central station. Overall, Helsinki is basically granite Swiss cheese due to parking garages, pedestrian tunnels, basements, bomb shelters, military tunnels, the metro etc and AFAIK all of it has been drilled and blasted, not TBM'd.
- Sharlin 9y agoYep, I'm Finnish myself and figured it has something to do with rock hardness. All the long tunnels in Finland I know of appear to be drilled and blasted, including very recently built ones like the Tampere Rantatunneli.
- varjag 9y agoMost tunnels in Norway are bored through, and I doubt we have any softer rock here.
- digi_owl 9y agoI seem to recall that they tried using a TBM in Sweden on a short rail tunnel, only for the TBM to get stuck and the project delayed by a decade...