4 ms·
Thanks; that's very informative. > The goal of Community-Oriented Enforcement is compliance, not punishment. Is there some record of the debate, if any, that
by forapurpose 9y ago
Thanks; that's very informative.
> The goal of Community-Oriented Enforcement is compliance, not punishment.
Is there some record of the debate, if any, that led to this policy? Clearly, financial costs are a deterrent that leads to compliance. Many laws, regulations, and contracts achieve compliance in this manner. That doesn't make the FSF's position wrong, but I wonder how they reached it.
The FSF agrees, to an extent: https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles https://www.fsf.org/licensing/enforcement-principles
Community-oriented enforcement must never prioritize financial gain. Financial penalties are a legitimate tool to achieve compliance when used judiciously. Logically, if the only penalty for violation is simply compliance with the original rules, bad actors will just wait for an enforcement action before even reading the GPL. That social model for copyleft and its enforcement is untenable and unsustainable. An enforcement system without a financial penalty favors bad actors over good ones, since the latter bear the minimal (but non-trivial) staffing cost of compliant distribution while the former avoid it ...
- afarrell 9y ago> deterrent that leads to compliance Note about general principles: a deterrent needs more than pain to ensure compliance. * There also needs to be a clear path to compliance. If the subject of a rule isn’t capable of complying, they won’t comply. * Knowledge about the possibility of violation & penalty needs to be available to the subject. * There needs to be consistency in what will ensure compliance. Otherwise, the subject is better off taking out insurance, raising their prices, and accepting fines as a cost of business. Or getting out of the situation entirely. ————————- There is a story from somewhere (possibly the warring states period of pre-Han China?) of a general who was late returning from an engagement. General: “what is the punishment for lateness?” Aide: “death.” General: “and and what is the penalty for mutiny?” Aide: “also death.” General: “Well, I suppose mutiny gives us a chance of survival. Summon the captains.”
- forapurpose 9y agoExcellent points, and great story. Thanks.
- ubernostrum 9y agoThe possibly-apocryphal story of the first Han ruler, Emperor Gaozu (pre-regnal name Liu Bang), is that he was overseeing the transport of convicts when some escaped. Since the penalty for allowing an escape was death, he released all of the convicts, went into the mountains and became the leader of an outlaw group which came out on top after the fall of the Qin dynasty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Gaozu_of_Han https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Gaozu_of_Han