According to the indictment (ok, "complaint"), conspiracy/racketeering. The particular product or service is irrelevant, and there's no implication that the pro

According to the indictment (ok, "complaint"), conspiracy/racketeering. The particular product or service is irrelevant, and there's no implication that the product itself was illegal. If he was a driver, or helped load trucks for them knowing their business was illegal, or sold them gas and delivered it to them at night with that knowledge, same violation. There have been problems with CEOs, for example Tobacco CEOs who knowingly sold to tobacco smugglers (Canadian tax avoiders) in huge quantities. Not to mention the opioid crisis, massive sales to transparently suspicious resellers, if memory serves. That said, it may make authorities happy to think this might slow the production or sale of safer or more secure phones.