3 ms·
Let's say it this way: imagine it was not prison, but a full therapy treatment and rehabilitation. Do you think that 3 years is enough to rehabilitate an adult
by sametmax 9y ago
Let's say it this way: imagine it was not prison, but a full therapy treatment and rehabilitation. Do you think that 3 years is enough to rehabilitate an adult that all the events in life lead him or her to kill somebody ?
Some people take 10 years to quit smoking.
Also, while I agree with your point on abusing the justice system and not using it for revenge, you must not forget that:
- currently we also use it as a deterrent system. Even if it doesn't work very well. If somebody is capable of killing someone else, there is a huge different between knowing you will pay 3 years or 10 for it. 3 years to get a reputation or get rid of a life road block could be calculated as an acceptable price.
- there is also the way the non-killers will see the system. If people are being honest, and they witness more and more than being a criminal has not the consequences they though is should have, then people will loose any trust they have in the system. It's a very bad long term side effect to have for a society. Really, really bad.
- StudentStuff 9y agoA murderer will murder, regardless of whether they are in prison for 1 year or 100 years afterward, they are not apt to estimate what a judge will give them for a particular crime. Deterrence for higher level crimes through harsher sentencing is ineffective.
- sametmax 9y agoYou are talking in absolute, and this is rarely true. What's "a murderer" ? Are all of them equals ? Do you think a Yakuza and a an person wanting an inheritance have the same views on violence ? And what if you have a one year sentence ? One month ? One week ? None ? Do you think there would be no difference ?
- forapurpose 9y agoIt would be great if we had some evidence to back this up.