4 ms·
It's all so sad... The ECB could solve these problems by a snap of their fingers at not cost. Almost everyone would profit. I'm stumped as to how to solve the p
by BenoitEssiambre 9y ago
It's all so sad... The ECB could solve these problems by a snap of their fingers at not cost. Almost everyone would profit. I'm stumped as to how to solve the problem of central bank incompetence.
- qubex 9y agoIt’s not only the ECB and it wouldn’t be at no cost, insofar as quantitative easing (which I think you’re referring to) would cause inflation which in turn would diminish the real value (in terms of future purchasing potential) of creditors and consequentially would be unpalatable to creditor nations (such as the much-maligned Germany, for example).
- BenoitEssiambre 9y agoAny gains Germany gets from overly tight money are temporary and transient. If they want to get a better deal on their loans, they should negotiate the loans better. Running a disastrous monetary policy to indirectly improve their loan terms is an insanely destructive thing to do both to the indebted countries and to the weaker parts of their own economy. Also, the loans they make are mostly with the countries' governments but as you probably know, euros are used by non government entities too. Germany shouldn't strangulate all of the eurozone's private markets just to manipulate terms of government loans. On top of this, not allowing people to work and destroying their countries' economies greatly increases the chance these countries are going to default or restructure parts of their debt, again, not to Germany advantage. Finally, having neighbors with poor economies is bad for your exports and your own businesses. In the long run Germany has much to gain if people of Europe have functioning investment markets and the tools are available for people to work and produce.
- qubex 9y agoActually you’re right. Italy at least is being totally ruined by this state of affairs. It seems that at some point this country is undergoing some kind of social collapse, and that once that has passed the critical threshold a financial side-effect will be inevitable. I don’t really see a way out of this. It seems that all the citizens are passengers in a crashing aeroplane, and that the pilots themselves are sitting up front but have been severed from the controls and stripped of all agency. The aviation the outcome would be obvious, and that’s why you’re essentially correct in saying that gravity needs to be switched off, at least temporarily, for the benefit of everybody. Again, I don’t see this happening.