3 ms·
While I have no idea given the... oddity... of this subthread, I might posit `tinc` is being referred to here: https://www.tinc-vpn.org/faq/ https://www.tinc-vp
by randywaterhouse 9y ago
While I have no idea given the... oddity... of this subthread, I might posit `tinc` is being referred to here: https://www.tinc-vpn.org/faq/ https://www.tinc-vpn.org/faq/
ETA: this is based on the open source code which may be modified, userland daemon status, /dev/tap usage... Portability... etc.
In any case - tinc is excellent
- feelin_googley 9y agoFWIW, that is not what I use. I should have not mentioned anything about other software. It is irrelevant to the question. The question was/is: How portable is WireGuard?
- davrosthedalek 9y agoOr, you could just say what you are using. Is there a reason you don't?
- darklajid 9y agohttps://www.wireguard.com/xplatform/ https://www.wireguard.com/xplatform/ There exist closed source third party clients for Windows/OS X, and wireguard itself has currently two (unreleased) reference libraries in Go and Rust to support future cross-platform clients. So the answer to "how portable" is probably "portable" :-) (I don't know if there are any plans for _kernel_ mode implementations for anything but Linux, but cross-platform user mode clients are part of the project's goals)
- feelin_googley 9y agoThank you. It sounds like portability may come via a userspace program. I look forward to it.