3 ms·
Could someone change this to http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm? The current link (http://richardspens.com/inde
by a1369209993 9y ago
Could someone change this to http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm? The current link (http://richardspens.com/index_m.html?page=ref/care/inks.htm http://richardspens.com/index_m.html?page=ref/care/inks.htm) is a "please allow us to run arbitrary malicious code on your computer" nag page.
- tzs 9y agoThat's a serious accusation. If you actually look at the code it wants to run, there is nothing malicious. It is just a small amount of (clearly written, not at all obfuscated) JavaScript to do innocuous things on the page, such as help with filling out forms, convert between Roman and Arabic numerals, provide a magnifier, and similar things (not all of which are actually used on that particular page).
- a1369209993 9y agoIt isn't a accusation in the first place; permission to run javascript at all includes permission to run arbitrary malicious code, and I never claimed (and don't care) whether they actually exploit that perrmission. And none of that changes the fact that the link is to the wrong page.
- mrob 9y agoThe page is served over HTTP, so it's permission for anybody who might happen to MITM your connection to run whatever code they like.
- dang 9y agoThat page seems better anyhow, so ok.
- a1369209993 9y ago... It's now pointing at http://richardspens.com/?page=ref/care/inks.htm http://richardspens.com/?page=ref/care/inks.htm. "That page" is http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm http://richardspens.com/ref/care/inks.htm with no ?page= in it. The current one is just a bunch of frame cruft around the original nag page.
- dang 9y agoAh ok, I've changed the link to that. For me the one just redirects to the other, though.