5 ms·

deleted

• nkozyra 9y ago
  What I'm saying is even if it was 100% infant mortality, the statistical odds of getting it still leaves the malarial resistance as a genetic advantage.
  • Lordarminius 9y ago
    Sorry. I don't get your point. Assuming 100% mortality, how could there possibly be an advantage if the genes of the afflicted cannot be propagated ?
    • tysonzni 9y ago
      People who have sickle cell anemia still have a life expectancy of years (>40 in US). On the other hand, getting malaria usually means you mortality is measured in days not years. Everyone has a "100% mortality" but the window of survival differs between diseases.
    • nkozyra 9y ago
      Because not every person with the mutation gets sickle cell anemia. There is essentially a genetic burn rate that is less than the fitness imparted via malarial resistance.