> Zero downtime deploys without Kubernetes or load balancers, circa 2003. it always irks me when i read a sentence like that. * if something went wrong, your

> Zero downtime deploys without Kubernetes or load balancers, circa 2003. it always irks me when i read a sentence like that. * if something went wrong, your site would've been down. completely. irrelevent and easy to recover from as a small hobby page, but incredibly expensive if you need to honor a high uptime SLA. * stateless services that don't need schema migrations are still very easy to upgrade without kubernetes -- or load balancers for that matter.