3 ms·
It was faster to do this than reading the content the way it was intended. Because they were using random selection you'd have to click 370 times to have a 90%
by keenerd 9y ago
It was faster to do this than reading the content the way it was intended. Because they were using random selection you'd have to click 370 times to have a 90% chance of seeing all 59. It is nearly impossible (like 7 nines impossible) to see all of them in under 120 clicks.