3 ms·
I never claimed systemd is the only init that doesn't use shell scripts. I simply gave an example of how it's an improvement over e.g. sysvinit.
by stephenr 9y ago
I never claimed systemd is the only init that doesn't use shell scripts.
I simply gave an example of how it's an improvement over e.g. sysvinit.
- JdeBP 9y agoClaiming it is not a necessary part of the fallacy. Basing one's argument on only those two is. The Uselessd Guy has some rather sharp comments, such as "you’ve been living under a rock for years", for that sort of thing. Even the Debian Hoo-Hah involved analysis of four systems. "The politics" that you critique include failures to look around and learn from (and indeed about) what already exists and has been done. Don't make the same mistake.
- stephenr 9y agoYou need to re-read what I actually wrote, and stop imposing your own predisposed ideas onto other people's commentary. One person asked about advantages of systemd. I listed one, and acknowledged systemd has issues. I didn't compare it to any specific init system. I didn't even claim that systemd is overall better or worse. I literally said: > Declarative system service configuration files are an advantage