3 ms·
OP did not say he hoped to see 'biologically equivalent' behavior, I don't think that't the argument of very many people. We're talking about replicating (usefu
by not_a_moth 9y ago
OP did not say he hoped to see 'biologically equivalent' behavior, I don't think that't the argument of very many people. We're talking about replicating (useful) aspects of intelligence and we use humans (or housecats) as our baselines, because that's where intelligence came from. And indeed, all forms of AI, including your latest NIPS conference showroom DL/ RL models are very brittle in replicating intelligence. As Ng said I think a year ago, the limit of AI right now is any mental task that a human can do in less than 1 second. Agents that reason about things are still in the realm of science fiction.