> (where your 4D argument doesn't apply) The 4D argument is even more applicable to human language, IMO. Object recognition pretty exclusively involves sight a

> (where your 4D argument doesn't apply) The 4D argument is even more applicable to human language, IMO. Object recognition pretty exclusively involves sight and touch. Human language involves all the senses, frequently at once. My Spanish is not great, but usually I can communicate pretty well despite that, partially because there are a lot of other contextual cues (body language, nonverbal vocalizations, known objects) I can use to figure things out. It's amazing how frequently the words don't matter at all, and the meaning is almost entirely contained in tone and pacing of speech.