Answering questions. I was joking :-) More simply and seriously : I like Stallman and Greene point of view. I agree with them because they are idealistic. But,

Answering questions. I was joking :-) More simply and seriously : I like Stallman and Greene point of view. I agree with them because they are idealistic. But, since the ideal they describe correspond quite well with my own, then I call that clairvoyance. I know it's not "right", but I was emphasizing the fact that when people agree with each other on political/ethical things, they often tend to think they're "right". So for me, I tend to see Stallman and Green has "clairvoyant". Of course, people who disagree with such clear cut idealism will often oppose the "lack of pragmatism" argument ('cos ideal don't work, everybody knows that !). I agree that's a very indirect demonstration. But I wanted to 1/ share my idealism and 2/ explain that I know that's idealism.