4 ms·
As a sometime English major, I’m biased, but the main objective (or perhaps side-effect) of the humanities, in my experience, was to teach one how to write. Reg
by jagthebeetle 9y ago
As a sometime English major, I’m biased, but the main objective (or perhaps side-effect) of the humanities, in my experience, was to teach one how to write. Regardless of “truth,” “values,” pottery, or poetry, modular, well-structured arguments were the main thing I got from that degree. Attempts to justify the actual content of humanities studies seem futile, if valiant, and nobody has been good at articulating deeper aims for English, at least. (I found anyway that I was able to write A papers without reading the material.)
(At any rate, this author might have taken a more Orwellian pen to their monograph.)
- barce 9y agoI would think a dystopian bent on the humanities would be much worse. They only exist to hide the real sins of the sciences' use (death, destruction, greed). Yeah, there is no justification... there is no science way to prop up the humanities. But if humanities teaches you to see in new ways, then you have to acknowledge that there's a hermeneutically useful set of tools on which science got based.