> it seems to be about the site creator trying to sell other people's submitted work for free. … Just above the section you quote: "All artists who end up in

> it seems to be about the site creator trying to sell other people's submitted work for free. … Just above the section you quote: "All artists who end up in the final copy will get an equal cut of the revenue made from selling the collection." Yeah, it sucks that you couldn't sell the stack you submit on your own for a year, but isn't almost always that the case for freelance work? When you're a freelance journalist, surely your client buys the right to publish your story exclusively for some period of time.