So original creator posts videos of static. Then another company says, wait, we have a copyright on that and so they start getting revenue from the videos. The

So original creator posts videos of static. Then another company says, wait, we have a copyright on that and so they start getting revenue from the videos. The original creator now looses revenue while they go through a process to counter the notice. This is fair, how? Why should the other party automatically start getting revenue? Why can't that money go into escrow and whichever party prevails gets that money? The problem is Google has no incentive to make this better.