5 ms·
Politely, you don't know what you're talking about here. If you read up on the author you get a much better picture of the orgs she's been a part of, the work
by angersock 9y ago
Politely, you don't know what you're talking about here.
If you read up on the author you get a much better picture of the orgs she's been a part of, the work she's done, and the problems she has done troubleshooting on, I think you might adjust your opinion a bit.
She suspected her team was underperforming and unfortunately the quietest way of verifying that is just not to be the one to step up. There was no "witch hunt" here.
- DoreenMichele 9y agoHer stated goal of proving the badness of coworkers is clearly outlined in the title of the piece. The piece itself in no way supports the assumption she asserts concerning their badness. Perhaps it is just bad writing that neither stands on its own nor indicates that there is additional material needed to fully appreciate it. I don't feel any personal obligation to do a lot of legwork here to bend over backwards to give her the benefit of the doubt, especially since I see no reason to doubt my conclusion.
- angersock 9y ago> since I see no reason to doubt my conclusion. That's because you clearly haven't worked in a technical role that involves babysitting, ma'am. If you can't spare the effort of researching somebody before calling bullshit, please continue that trend and spare the effort of spouting off. :)