4 ms·
musl: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-16859/Musl-libc.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1685... Can't find s
by sebcat 9y ago
musl: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-16859/Musl-libc.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1685...
Can't find separate listings for libc in FreeBSD, OpenBSD but the list is smaller than glibc if you check e.g., VuXML or https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-97/product_id-163/Openbsd-Openbsd.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-97/p...
Looks like glibc is the worst sinner here.
- rwmj 9y agoMore people study and use glibc, so I guess they find more bugs. On the other hand glibc has a larger code base. Anyway it's difficult to compare bug counts across projects.