> The consensus model is based on human review of the underlying code; humans get to decide whether to include a block in their version of the repository. Sinc

> The consensus model is based on human review of the underlying code; humans get to decide whether to include a block in their version of the repository. Since git commits can easily be signed (and IMO should be most of the time), when I explain this I usually try to describe the consensus algorithm as being based on a set of known valid signers which I think further helps bridge the gap for people that understand "proof of authority" chains. https://github.com/paritytech/parity/wiki/Proof-of-Authority-Chains https://github.com/paritytech/parity/wiki/Proof-of-Authority...