3 ms·
> Their "taking into account" seems like mere handwaving away. How would the ending of a civil war not be associated with an increase in mental health? From t
by Chathamization 9y ago
> Their "taking into account" seems like mere handwaving away. How would the ending of a civil war not be associated with an increase in mental health?
From the paper:
> The temporal changes in suicide do not appear to correspond with the period of civil war (1983-2002).[27] By the time of the outbreak of the civil war in 1983, Sri Lankan suicide rates were already extremely high – 37.6 per 100,000 in 1982. In subsequent years, suicide rates stabilised. The civil war was still in progress at the time suicide rates began declining in 1995. By the time of the ceasefire in 2002 rates had already halved, and suicides rates were relatively stable in the 3 years after the ceasefire.
They also link to studies showing that wars tend to be associated with decreased the rates of suicide.
- manjushri 9y agoConsidering the fluid nature of social dynamics, there still seems to be a relation there. >By the time of the outbreak of the civil war in 1983, Sri Lankan suicide rates were already extremely high Civil wars don't just spontaneously start for no reason. They start because people have been unhappy for a long time. Notice also that the suicide rate began peaking during the Elam War II phase of the civil war, a time of "unprecedented brutality", and then began declining at the time of the ceasefire. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_Civil_War https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_Civil_War