6 ms·

I think there's a big difference between what the headline is implying (some kind of hugely complex, hard-to-create UI), and what the article itself is saying.

I think there's a big difference between what the headline is implying (some kind of hugely complex, hard-to-create UI), and what the article itself is saying. From what I can gather, the devs wanted to distill the entire game experience into something that is displayable in a simple manner, and as a core driver, this affected nearly every part of the game. I'm also watching Into the Breach with some curiosity; the game seems to be a lot of fun, and has an amazing soundtrack. I wonder if it will be as big a success as FTL, and if so, whether it will be on its own merit, or the mass following they have due to FTL.

girvo 9y ago
To your later point: I never played FTL, but a pixel-art turn-based kaiju-killing tactics game was just too awesome to pass up. And it runs perfectly under Wineskin on my Mac :)
- Kagerjay 9y ago
  I played both FTL and Into the Breach, I would say FTL is still my favorite of the two since it has more rogue-like RNG elements built into it. Also the final boss in FTL was way more fun than in this game
  - mihaifm 9y ago
    > Also the final boss in FTL was way more fun than in this game Not so fun for me, never managed to beat it after 3-4 tries, on easy difficulty while fully upgraded. I think that part could use a redesign, it's what made me loose interest in the game...although overall I think it's a great game.
    - danielbarla 9y ago
      The genius of it is that the best players in the world can get a 30 run win streak, so it's mostly about having a good strategy and playing well. On the other hand, you pretty much will need to know exactly how to beat the final boss, or spend several runs figuring it out... So you are right, it's not noob friendly. On the other hand, it's one of the most sublimely balanced roguelikes.
      - Kagerjay 9y ago
        Figuring out how to beat the final boss and beating it for the first time was very fun. First few runs I got confused on the final boss map, ended up going to rebel controlled territory, escaping into final boss with a extremely unprepared / damaged ship. I ended up having to unlock several more powerful ships and beat it via the starter Mantis ship (no weapons starting off + 2 mantises). On my first successful run, I had a double charge II laser, a lvl3 defense II drone, and a 4 man warp pad, so the final boss ended up being pretty easy with solid focus fire damage, boarding, and defense.
      - Sinidir 9y ago
        Stealth and Transporters. Made it kind of a boring game after figuring that this was the dominant combo to beat the boss.
    - baldfat 9y ago
      Roguelikes aren't to be played only a handful of times. They are suppose to be hard and that is their replay ability. If you could beat FTL in 3 or 4 turns it would have ruined the game.
    - aidenn0 9y ago
      For me I had a different problem. On the Easy difficulty I made it to the boss the 2nd time I played, and almost every playthrough after and I won about 90% of the time. However on "normal" difficulty it was several dozen playthroughs before I could get to the boss, and I was so under-upgraded that I had basically zero chance. I think I have 1 win to my name on normal difficulty (not counting the crystal ship, which is clearly overpowered). I find the only way I can reliably do well on normal difficulty is to take a lot of early risks and then just restart if I don't get lucky.
      - jandrese 9y ago
        I used to think the game was a little too RNG dependent but then I hear about people online who can beat the game 100 times in a row on hard mode and I realize I just suck at it.
        aidenn0 9y ago
        It's certainly way less capricious than your average roguelike...
    - Kagerjay 9y ago
      I remember taking like 30-40 runs before I even beat FTL on normal mode. That's what makes roguelike games fun, that winning depends both on skill and luck, and every iteration of losing on final boss gives you insight on how to beat it. Into the breach kind of lacked roguelike RNG to the extent that every run more or less felt the same, so I ended up unlocking everything I wanted to after 3 days of playing. You also had infinite amounts of time to decide on actions in intoTheBreach, so there was no sense of urgency and it ended up becoming super easy to beat. Beating it on 1 try was a little disappointing for me. I had higher hopes for intoTheBreach
    - woolvalley 9y ago
      It's been a few years, but my winning strategy was using the square ship which I think had a self repair function or similar and disabling the boss ship as much as possible through fires, teleporting people to disable specific guns and using ion weapons. So not going for a full direct firepower method.
- dom96 9y ago
  Awww, no native macOS version? I was going to buy this but that discourages me a little (getting it running with Wine and Steam sounds like a PITA).
  - ndrake 9y ago
    I followed these steps: https://www.reddit.com/r/IntoTheBreach/comments/80nt36/i_have_successfully_installed_into_the_breach_on/ https://www.reddit.com/r/IntoTheBreach/comments/80nt36/i_hav... Works perfectly.
  - BOBOTWINSTON 9y ago
    This is on their road map. Consoles/mobile are where they are still hesitating due to the experience they had with FTL porting.
    - gh02t 9y ago
      I'm really hoping for mobile, Into the Breach would work really well on mobile due to its bite sized battles and clean UI.
      - wlesieutre 9y ago
        Agree, I'm holding off on buying because I'm not sure I'd sit down and play this on my desktop, but it looks like it would be great on iPad.
        gh02t 9y ago
        Oh I've played the crap out of it on the desktop already, it's great as is.
        wlesieutre 9y ago
        But it's competing against a lot of other great things on my desktop. All else equal, I'd rather buy it on the platform where I don't have tons of quality alternatives that I own already.
tehcyse 9y ago
I didn't like FTL but Into the Breach has me hooked! The game isn't in the same genre (even if it looks a bit similar from outside) and is really good, I don't see why it wouldn't succeed.
cryoshon 9y ago
it's fun, but imo FTL is my favorite because it seems to have way more replayability. i haven't cracked the harder difficulties of ITB yet -- not that difficulty is an issue -- but the gameplay just seems so very similar from one run to the next, even if it's engaging for the moment.
- Kiro 9y ago
  Yeah, I feel the same. I felt way more attached to the runs in FTL and excited for every new game.
- swolchok 9y ago
  Try a different mech squad. Blitzkrieg, for example, is vaguely similar to the Rift Walkers in composition but the mechs have much more specialized roles.
  - gh02t 9y ago
    Random or custom squads also add a lot of diversity, though I do agree that Into the Breach doesn't have quite as much replayability as FTL with its greater element of randomness in encounters. I love Into the Breach and have played it a ton, but my biggest criticism is that the campaign itself doesn't provide enough variety; the individual missions vary from game to game but they are still a bit samey and there aren't any that stand out. I'm hoping there will be an expansion some day to mix things up a bit, either with some new mechanics or just giving us more islands and mission types.
masklinn 9y ago
> I wonder if it will be as big a success as FTL, and if so, whether it will be on its own merit, or the mass following they have due to FTL. It's a very different game than FTL so while I'd expect previous FTL owners to check it out I wouldn't necessarily expect all of them to be interested (I was, and I really like ITB though I'm quite terrible at tactical games) (then again I'm also bad at roguelikes).
- jandrese 9y ago
  ITB feels more like a puzzle game to me than a traditional tactics game.
b0rsuk 9y ago
Amazing soundtrack ? I think it's entirely forgettable, almost as bad as XCOM2 (generic American war movie). To the point I would advocate spending that money on more sound effects. But my point is that this kind of GUI approach is very much like a board game. In board games you have a few standard types of pieces, like cards, tokens, meeples, and you design a game with them in mind. The more of these objects you have, the more players have to move around and keep track of. More complex mechanics often add more physical objects. So as a general rule, good board game designers design games with as few objects as possible. Because there's no computer to keep track of things for you, unnecessary complexity is more apparent in board games. Best board game designers design exciting mechanics with creative use of small number of elements. Those games, with high "compression ratio", tend to be my favourite. A few examples are Tigris&Euphrates and Lords of Scotland.
- baldfat 9y ago
  > Amazing soundtrack ? I think it's entirely forgettable Well to me the very point of a good sound track is immersion and is something to not standout. That is why Ben Prunty's FTL Sound Track was so good. The fact that the music builds up after you place your three mechs was brilliant. Now ambient music might not be your thing but the games music was skillfully made and isn't some generic tomb of sounds. It was music for a turn based generated puzzles. Now if this was an album for radio sure forgettable would be horrible comment. For this it is almost a compliment. Most games I just mute the music because it just gets in the way. Just saw this article: https://www.pcgamer.com/how-i-made-into-the-breachs-soundtrack/ https://www.pcgamer.com/how-i-made-into-the-breachs-soundtra...
  - b0rsuk 9y ago
    I understand your point, but it's hardly the best example of a soundtrack that doesn't get in the way. Red Alert(1) from 1996 got a "soundtrack of the year" award. Initially I was puzzled by that. It has a few great tracks, but not amazing. Until you play the soundtrack in a loop. The tracks are very atmospheric and totally unobtrusive. Another soundtrack by Frank Klepacki - Tiberian Sun - is also not something you would play on a concert. But it serves a perfect background, too. Then I understood there's more to a great game soundtrack than very memorable tunes. XCOM2 soundtrack is optimized for short term, for trailers even. Red Alert 1, Tiberian Sun soundtracks are optimized for long term, to be loopable. I need to get in touch with newer games, but I have very fond memories of Master of Magic, Heroes of Might and Magic 1-4, Magic Carpet, Dungeon Keeper1,2; Little Big Adventure. Those were definitely special and music was a big part of it. From newer games I appreciate Rimworld. It may be inspired by country and Firefly, but it's something I'm happy to play on a loop. Incidentally ambient music artists are some of my favorites. I love programming while listening to the British band Fluke (on youtube) or even Orbital. Even ayahuasca shamanic songs.
baldfat 9y ago
> headline is implying (some kind of hugely complex, hard-to-create UI) Making anything simple is HUGELY complex. It took them years to get what they wanted and it shows. I think complex UI is actually lazy work. Space 4X games have notorious UI. Endless Space 2's interface might be much simpler than others but I guarantee you they put more time into refining their interface. Being able to explain or create something "simple" is perhaps the hardest part of creating, and is much harder than naming things in programming and that actually is perhaps is the hardest part.
- andywood 9y ago
  I made a game that has this design principle. The UI is all point-click and a few icons. But it presents things like: what you can do to the object in front of you, with the item in your hand. What you can do with items you have on hand. What you could do if you had an item that you know about. Hints about what you could do if you knew something you don't know yet. This is all distilled to a single icon with decorations, but computing it all correctly is quite involved.
- vanderZwan 9y ago
  > Making anything simple is HUGELY complex. It took them years to get what they wanted and it shows. I think complex UI is actually lazy work. As an interaction designer: thank you! I wish more people understood this.
- danielbarla 9y ago
  I think we're in agreement; I'm in no way belittling their efforts, quite the opposite. My point is just that it's not the UI itself that's complex in these scenarios, it's the entire package. Attributing the complexity to the UI is the same as a user who blames the front-end when a system goes down, while in reality that is the interaction area and there's a mountain beneath that.

girvo 9y ago

To your later point: I never played FTL, but a pixel-art turn-based kaiju-killing tactics game was just too awesome to pass up. And it runs perfectly under Wineskin on my Mac :)

Kagerjay 9y ago
I played both FTL and Into the Breach, I would say FTL is still my favorite of the two since it has more rogue-like RNG elements built into it. Also the final boss in FTL was way more fun than in this game
- mihaifm 9y ago
  > Also the final boss in FTL was way more fun than in this game Not so fun for me, never managed to beat it after 3-4 tries, on easy difficulty while fully upgraded. I think that part could use a redesign, it's what made me loose interest in the game...although overall I think it's a great game.
  - danielbarla 9y ago
    The genius of it is that the best players in the world can get a 30 run win streak, so it's mostly about having a good strategy and playing well. On the other hand, you pretty much will need to know exactly how to beat the final boss, or spend several runs figuring it out... So you are right, it's not noob friendly. On the other hand, it's one of the most sublimely balanced roguelikes.
    - Kagerjay 9y ago
      Figuring out how to beat the final boss and beating it for the first time was very fun. First few runs I got confused on the final boss map, ended up going to rebel controlled territory, escaping into final boss with a extremely unprepared / damaged ship. I ended up having to unlock several more powerful ships and beat it via the starter Mantis ship (no weapons starting off + 2 mantises). On my first successful run, I had a double charge II laser, a lvl3 defense II drone, and a 4 man warp pad, so the final boss ended up being pretty easy with solid focus fire damage, boarding, and defense.
    - Sinidir 9y ago
      Stealth and Transporters. Made it kind of a boring game after figuring that this was the dominant combo to beat the boss.
  - baldfat 9y ago
    Roguelikes aren't to be played only a handful of times. They are suppose to be hard and that is their replay ability. If you could beat FTL in 3 or 4 turns it would have ruined the game.
  - aidenn0 9y ago
    For me I had a different problem. On the Easy difficulty I made it to the boss the 2nd time I played, and almost every playthrough after and I won about 90% of the time. However on "normal" difficulty it was several dozen playthroughs before I could get to the boss, and I was so under-upgraded that I had basically zero chance. I think I have 1 win to my name on normal difficulty (not counting the crystal ship, which is clearly overpowered). I find the only way I can reliably do well on normal difficulty is to take a lot of early risks and then just restart if I don't get lucky.
    - jandrese 9y ago
      I used to think the game was a little too RNG dependent but then I hear about people online who can beat the game 100 times in a row on hard mode and I realize I just suck at it.
      - aidenn0 9y ago
        It's certainly way less capricious than your average roguelike...
  - Kagerjay 9y ago
    I remember taking like 30-40 runs before I even beat FTL on normal mode. That's what makes roguelike games fun, that winning depends both on skill and luck, and every iteration of losing on final boss gives you insight on how to beat it. Into the breach kind of lacked roguelike RNG to the extent that every run more or less felt the same, so I ended up unlocking everything I wanted to after 3 days of playing. You also had infinite amounts of time to decide on actions in intoTheBreach, so there was no sense of urgency and it ended up becoming super easy to beat. Beating it on 1 try was a little disappointing for me. I had higher hopes for intoTheBreach
  - woolvalley 9y ago
    It's been a few years, but my winning strategy was using the square ship which I think had a self repair function or similar and disabling the boss ship as much as possible through fires, teleporting people to disable specific guns and using ion weapons. So not going for a full direct firepower method.
dom96 9y ago
Awww, no native macOS version? I was going to buy this but that discourages me a little (getting it running with Wine and Steam sounds like a PITA).
- ndrake 9y ago
  I followed these steps: https://www.reddit.com/r/IntoTheBreach/comments/80nt36/i_have_successfully_installed_into_the_breach_on/ https://www.reddit.com/r/IntoTheBreach/comments/80nt36/i_hav... Works perfectly.
- BOBOTWINSTON 9y ago
  This is on their road map. Consoles/mobile are where they are still hesitating due to the experience they had with FTL porting.
  - gh02t 9y ago
    I'm really hoping for mobile, Into the Breach would work really well on mobile due to its bite sized battles and clean UI.
    - wlesieutre 9y ago
      Agree, I'm holding off on buying because I'm not sure I'd sit down and play this on my desktop, but it looks like it would be great on iPad.
      - gh02t 9y ago
        Oh I've played the crap out of it on the desktop already, it's great as is.
        wlesieutre 9y ago
        But it's competing against a lot of other great things on my desktop. All else equal, I'd rather buy it on the platform where I don't have tons of quality alternatives that I own already.

tehcyse 9y ago

I didn't like FTL but Into the Breach has me hooked! The game isn't in the same genre (even if it looks a bit similar from outside) and is really good, I don't see why it wouldn't succeed.

cryoshon 9y ago

it's fun, but imo FTL is my favorite because it seems to have way more replayability. i haven't cracked the harder difficulties of ITB yet -- not that difficulty is an issue -- but the gameplay just seems so very similar from one run to the next, even if it's engaging for the moment.

Kiro 9y ago
Yeah, I feel the same. I felt way more attached to the runs in FTL and excited for every new game.
swolchok 9y ago
Try a different mech squad. Blitzkrieg, for example, is vaguely similar to the Rift Walkers in composition but the mechs have much more specialized roles.
- gh02t 9y ago
  Random or custom squads also add a lot of diversity, though I do agree that Into the Breach doesn't have quite as much replayability as FTL with its greater element of randomness in encounters. I love Into the Breach and have played it a ton, but my biggest criticism is that the campaign itself doesn't provide enough variety; the individual missions vary from game to game but they are still a bit samey and there aren't any that stand out. I'm hoping there will be an expansion some day to mix things up a bit, either with some new mechanics or just giving us more islands and mission types.

masklinn 9y ago

> I wonder if it will be as big a success as FTL, and if so, whether it will be on its own merit, or the mass following they have due to FTL. It's a very different game than FTL so while I'd expect previous FTL owners to check it out I wouldn't necessarily expect all of them to be interested (I was, and I really like ITB though I'm quite terrible at tactical games) (then again I'm also bad at roguelikes).

jandrese 9y ago
ITB feels more like a puzzle game to me than a traditional tactics game.

b0rsuk 9y ago

Amazing soundtrack ? I think it's entirely forgettable, almost as bad as XCOM2 (generic American war movie). To the point I would advocate spending that money on more sound effects. But my point is that this kind of GUI approach is very much like a board game. In board games you have a few standard types of pieces, like cards, tokens, meeples, and you design a game with them in mind. The more of these objects you have, the more players have to move around and keep track of. More complex mechanics often add more physical objects. So as a general rule, good board game designers design games with as few objects as possible. Because there's no computer to keep track of things for you, unnecessary complexity is more apparent in board games. Best board game designers design exciting mechanics with creative use of small number of elements. Those games, with high "compression ratio", tend to be my favourite. A few examples are Tigris&Euphrates and Lords of Scotland.

baldfat 9y ago
> Amazing soundtrack ? I think it's entirely forgettable Well to me the very point of a good sound track is immersion and is something to not standout. That is why Ben Prunty's FTL Sound Track was so good. The fact that the music builds up after you place your three mechs was brilliant. Now ambient music might not be your thing but the games music was skillfully made and isn't some generic tomb of sounds. It was music for a turn based generated puzzles. Now if this was an album for radio sure forgettable would be horrible comment. For this it is almost a compliment. Most games I just mute the music because it just gets in the way. Just saw this article: https://www.pcgamer.com/how-i-made-into-the-breachs-soundtrack/ https://www.pcgamer.com/how-i-made-into-the-breachs-soundtra...
- b0rsuk 9y ago
  I understand your point, but it's hardly the best example of a soundtrack that doesn't get in the way. Red Alert(1) from 1996 got a "soundtrack of the year" award. Initially I was puzzled by that. It has a few great tracks, but not amazing. Until you play the soundtrack in a loop. The tracks are very atmospheric and totally unobtrusive. Another soundtrack by Frank Klepacki - Tiberian Sun - is also not something you would play on a concert. But it serves a perfect background, too. Then I understood there's more to a great game soundtrack than very memorable tunes. XCOM2 soundtrack is optimized for short term, for trailers even. Red Alert 1, Tiberian Sun soundtracks are optimized for long term, to be loopable. I need to get in touch with newer games, but I have very fond memories of Master of Magic, Heroes of Might and Magic 1-4, Magic Carpet, Dungeon Keeper1,2; Little Big Adventure. Those were definitely special and music was a big part of it. From newer games I appreciate Rimworld. It may be inspired by country and Firefly, but it's something I'm happy to play on a loop. Incidentally ambient music artists are some of my favorites. I love programming while listening to the British band Fluke (on youtube) or even Orbital. Even ayahuasca shamanic songs.

baldfat 9y ago

> headline is implying (some kind of hugely complex, hard-to-create UI) Making anything simple is HUGELY complex. It took them years to get what they wanted and it shows. I think complex UI is actually lazy work. Space 4X games have notorious UI. Endless Space 2's interface might be much simpler than others but I guarantee you they put more time into refining their interface. Being able to explain or create something "simple" is perhaps the hardest part of creating, and is much harder than naming things in programming and that actually is perhaps is the hardest part.

andywood 9y ago
I made a game that has this design principle. The UI is all point-click and a few icons. But it presents things like: what you can do to the object in front of you, with the item in your hand. What you can do with items you have on hand. What you could do if you had an item that you know about. Hints about what you could do if you knew something you don't know yet. This is all distilled to a single icon with decorations, but computing it all correctly is quite involved.
vanderZwan 9y ago
> Making anything simple is HUGELY complex. It took them years to get what they wanted and it shows. I think complex UI is actually lazy work. As an interaction designer: thank you! I wish more people understood this.
danielbarla 9y ago
I think we're in agreement; I'm in no way belittling their efforts, quite the opposite. My point is just that it's not the UI itself that's complex in these scenarios, it's the entire package. Attributing the complexity to the UI is the same as a user who blames the front-end when a system goes down, while in reality that is the interaction area and there's a mountain beneath that.