4 ms·
I would love to see these in a stereoscopic viewer. If they really were taken that close together in time, and given the huge binocular separation, there shou
by ScottBurson 9y ago
I would love to see these in a stereoscopic viewer. If they really were taken that close together in time, and given the huge binocular separation, there should be a hell of a 3-D effect.
- sambeau 9y agoIf you squint your eyes enough you can make them overlap and sure enough you get a perfect piece of 3D. The water at the front is a mess but the lighthouse and the spray have real depth.
- panic 9y agoCheck out the comments at the bottom of the article -- "trialex" put together a "wiggle gif" version (https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/42ab07151119e1a3d5a43faabdeee0d2ffe523624565abc2206c37966793bb16.gif https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/42ab07151119e1a3d5a43fa...) and "Michael Wise" posted a cross-eyed version (https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2903120ac9e726088a33b8de9c30e703b297242a95d294371e5d3b6855605517.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2903120ac9e726088a33b8d...).
- pure-awesome 9y agoWow! They should make this into an actual one of those stereographic pictures!