6 ms·

This has always been one of my favorite photographic coincidences. https://calculatedimages.blogspot.com/2013/05/3d-lightning.html https://calculatedimages.blog

This has always been one of my favorite photographic coincidences. https://calculatedimages.blogspot.com/2013/05/3d-lightning.html https://calculatedimages.blogspot.com/2013/05/3d-lightning.h...

lervag 9y ago
Google Chrome thinks this site is dangerous: Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from calculatedimages.blogspot.com (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID The message details continues to say that > You cannot visit calculatedimages.blogspot.com right now because the website uses HSTS. Network errors and attacks are usually temporary, so this page will probably work later.
- NinjaKitten 9y ago
  Are you sure you don't have a configuration error on your end? Time set correctly etc? Maybe some MITM on your network? Dodgy SSL certs in your OS? Blogspot is a google operated domain after all.
- bjpbakker 9y ago
  The certificate is signed by a Google intermediate CA using GlobalSign as the root CA. I don't use Chrome but I find it hard to believe that Chrome now distrusts Google's own CAs. A user errors seems more likely :)
  - nolok 9y ago
    For the record : those two parts (their CA / own services, and their teams responsible for security) are really well separated and it is not the first time a Google thingy is deemed unsafe by Google security. Whatever one thinks of Google, it's hard to not agree that they take security very seriously, both internal and external (and project zero is one of the best thing ever). Personally, I prefer it that way. Better to see "ahah, Google tells me Google is insecure" than allowing something flagged as bad just because it come from the same mothership.
    - bjpbakker 9y ago
      > Whatever one thinks of Google, it's hard to not agree that they take security very seriously I completely agree. Don’t think I stated otherwise? Anyway, I find it hard to believe for any browser to untrust Google’s intermediate CA. And more so for Global Sign. That said I recon that especially if Chrome started distruating Google CA that we all heard about it ;)
- hmottestad 9y ago
  Fyi. This is the cert I'm getting: https://imgur.com/a/D1RQ2 https://imgur.com/a/D1RQ2
  - vardump 9y ago
    That's curious. I'm getting a different cert at least. No cert errors. Both certs have same common name, etc. But that's where the similarities end. This is the cert I'm getting: Serial number: 4254239493315191306 Validity: Tuesday, 20 February 2018 - Tuesday, 15 May 2018 Public key: CC 4E F8 20 68 0A 0D BC B4 78 81 CA BF 4A B3 DD 5A CF 51 FC 0C 1A 12 0C C4 DF FD 77 A2 1A 26 30 6A BC 6A 1A DB 3D D6 68 5B 99 20 D0 79 C8 7F FA 5A AC 5D 23 DB B3 13 03 D1 21 A4 9E A6 CC 9E 77 AF 95 FD AA A2 10 E1 94 D4 96 B3 AB 0F F0 0F 34 35 AB 8D 9E E5 40 61 18 8D A0 E0 0D A5 EA D2 E9 8D 7C 45 9F B8 4C 3F 0F DD 84 BB 6A BC 3C FB CF 48 3B D1 66 8C FE 87 79 AA 36 E9 E3 CD 37 05 74 C2 0A B0 1D AC A6 E5 2B 5A 7B C5 BB 57 C5 2C 7A 5E 0B EB DD 9E 80 8D 1F 47 50 38 BB 9A 18 31 78 EE E6 D9 BC D6 D0 EA A6 07 2F 49 6F 47 01 E9 2A 87 DE BE A6 5D 3D CC 3A CA 05 93 C4 C9 00 AB F1 21 16 40 00 25 E5 9C 52 96 EB A7 43 50 05 AC D5 86 C4 A3 01 BA 08 FB EA 72 97 4D C6 49 6E 75 6C 69 BE 7C C1 BB 87 0D 0B 27 54 10 D0 9E 5E FF 12 A0 B8 48 A8 2D B6 1A E0 B7 92 B0 DE AF 3D 5B F9 Signature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
  - vardump 9y ago
    No foul play, also managed to get same cert you got (with public key 92 e0 55 f9 af 61 0d 7e 7e db 21 84 d5 dc 59 21...). Perhaps Google uses multiple certs with same Common Name on different servers. If so, I wonder if there's some security benefit. Or what could the reason for that be?
- rplnt 9y ago
  Well it crashed my whole browser (Vivaldi, OSX) after I scrolled a bit, so Chrome has a point I guess.
  - ygra 9y ago
    If the browser crashes when rendering a site is the site dangerous or the browser buggy?
    - rplnt 9y ago
      Why not both?
- martin-adams 9y ago
  I've experienced that type of issue a couple of times when using antivirus software.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
JepZ 9y ago
The result is a pretty cool 3d photo of lightning.
- excalibur 9y ago
  It's kind of amusing that in the 3D model the lightning bolt's shadow is visible, as if it were an obstruction rather than a light source.
  - sampo 9y ago
    I think everyone who visualizes laser beams, light rays, etc. forgets to set the no_shadow property at first, and then chuckles upon seeing the result.
jordache 9y ago
This article is far more amazing than the OP's link.
- arcticfox 9y ago
  It's a matter of opinion but I strongly disagree, the brief existence of a lightning bolt is going to force the exact same moment out of two photographers, and they were shot from two wildly different locations. The analysis was fairly cool but I see cool things every day. The sheer improbability of two photographers capturing the same wave in the exact same way from meters apart and publishing the same shot is captivating. There are thousands of waves daily, and thousands of interesting places to capture them.
  - jordache 9y ago
    not really. one you setup your tripod there, you are already focusing on the light house... and then when a wave is crashing in, you just hold down the shutter for a few burst shots... very easy to replicate the same shot... say if it was a photo group... then the chance of same shot being outputted is even greater

This has always been one of my favorite photographic coincidences. https://calculatedimages.blogspot.com/2013/05/3d-lightning.html https://calculatedimages.blogspot.com/2013/05/3d-lightning.h...

lervag 9y ago

Google Chrome thinks this site is dangerous: Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from calculatedimages.blogspot.com (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID The message details continues to say that > You cannot visit calculatedimages.blogspot.com right now because the website uses HSTS. Network errors and attacks are usually temporary, so this page will probably work later.

NinjaKitten 9y ago
Are you sure you don't have a configuration error on your end? Time set correctly etc? Maybe some MITM on your network? Dodgy SSL certs in your OS? Blogspot is a google operated domain after all.
bjpbakker 9y ago
The certificate is signed by a Google intermediate CA using GlobalSign as the root CA. I don't use Chrome but I find it hard to believe that Chrome now distrusts Google's own CAs. A user errors seems more likely :)
- nolok 9y ago
  For the record : those two parts (their CA / own services, and their teams responsible for security) are really well separated and it is not the first time a Google thingy is deemed unsafe by Google security. Whatever one thinks of Google, it's hard to not agree that they take security very seriously, both internal and external (and project zero is one of the best thing ever). Personally, I prefer it that way. Better to see "ahah, Google tells me Google is insecure" than allowing something flagged as bad just because it come from the same mothership.
  - bjpbakker 9y ago
    > Whatever one thinks of Google, it's hard to not agree that they take security very seriously I completely agree. Don’t think I stated otherwise? Anyway, I find it hard to believe for any browser to untrust Google’s intermediate CA. And more so for Global Sign. That said I recon that especially if Chrome started distruating Google CA that we all heard about it ;)
hmottestad 9y ago
Fyi. This is the cert I'm getting: https://imgur.com/a/D1RQ2 https://imgur.com/a/D1RQ2
- vardump 9y ago
  That's curious. I'm getting a different cert at least. No cert errors. Both certs have same common name, etc. But that's where the similarities end. This is the cert I'm getting: Serial number: 4254239493315191306 Validity: Tuesday, 20 February 2018 - Tuesday, 15 May 2018 Public key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ignature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
- vardump 9y ago
  No foul play, also managed to get same cert you got (with public key 92 e0 55 f9 af 61 0d 7e 7e db 21 84 d5 dc 59 21...). Perhaps Google uses multiple certs with same Common Name on different servers. If so, I wonder if there's some security benefit. Or what could the reason for that be?
rplnt 9y ago
Well it crashed my whole browser (Vivaldi, OSX) after I scrolled a bit, so Chrome has a point I guess.
- ygra 9y ago
  If the browser crashes when rendering a site is the site dangerous or the browser buggy?
  - rplnt 9y ago
    Why not both?
martin-adams 9y ago
I've experienced that type of issue a couple of times when using antivirus software.
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]

JepZ 9y ago

The result is a pretty cool 3d photo of lightning.

excalibur 9y ago
It's kind of amusing that in the 3D model the lightning bolt's shadow is visible, as if it were an obstruction rather than a light source.
- sampo 9y ago
  I think everyone who visualizes laser beams, light rays, etc. forgets to set the no_shadow property at first, and then chuckles upon seeing the result.

jordache 9y ago

This article is far more amazing than the OP's link.

arcticfox 9y ago
It's a matter of opinion but I strongly disagree, the brief existence of a lightning bolt is going to force the exact same moment out of two photographers, and they were shot from two wildly different locations. The analysis was fairly cool but I see cool things every day. The sheer improbability of two photographers capturing the same wave in the exact same way from meters apart and publishing the same shot is captivating. There are thousands of waves daily, and thousands of interesting places to capture them.
- jordache 9y ago
  not really. one you setup your tripod there, you are already focusing on the light house... and then when a wave is crashing in, you just hold down the shutter for a few burst shots... very easy to replicate the same shot... say if it was a photo group... then the chance of same shot being outputted is even greater