3 ms·
> In terms of UX this system is currently pretty ugly, but the actual concept makes sense. This seems like a trivial gain for lousy UX, since it's possible the
by bb88 9y ago
> In terms of UX this system is currently pretty ugly, but the actual concept makes sense.
This seems like a trivial gain for lousy UX, since it's possible the account and the device is compromised.
- cyphar 9y agoThey are working on the UX side of things. I disagree that it's a trivial gain. Signal works in the same way, except that they only really support having a single device (that's where the safety number changing warning comes from). Having per-device keys also means that the server cannot decrypt your messages (because the identity key is not used for communication, it's just used to register new keys that clients will encrypt their messages to). Having a global decryption key stored on the server would be a less secure design.