3 ms·
How about if the owner of the blockchain (here I'm assuming, say, a land-ownership database run by the state) have a private key for each person in their own sy
by neltnerb 9y ago
How about if the owner of the blockchain (here I'm assuming, say, a land-ownership database run by the state) have a private key for each person in their own system which they use to put the relevant data into a blockchain. Then they delete the private key for that person to scramble entries that need deleting so no one can ever access it again. The person doesn't need to have or know their own private key since it's a backend for the municipal service.
Now why anyone would want to do this with a blockchain instead of a simple encrypted database... well, maybe someone else can explain that. I'm still assuming you visit deeds.mass.gov or something and have an interface you would use to find out who owns what, so the end user isn't actually touching the blockchain in this case.
- Kalium 9y agoAs I understand PKI, and my understanding is limited so I could of course be very wrong, but in the scenario you describe the deletion of the private key would do nothing to prevent people from decrypting data readable with a public key. This would work with a symmetric key! But as you say, I'm struggling to think of any real advantages to using a blockchain here.